Check the Free demo of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Dumps with 294 Questions
Clear your concepts with ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions Before Attempting Real exam
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer certification exam is designed for individuals who have a deep understanding of information security management systems (ISMS) implementation process. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam certification validates the practical skills and knowledge required to implement an ISMS based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam covers the implementation process of an ISMS, including the development of policies and procedures, risk management, security controls, and performance measurement. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam also assesses the candidate’s ability to lead an implementation team through the process of implementing an ISMS in an organization. The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer certification is intended for professionals who want to demonstrate their ability to implement an ISMS in an organization, including IT professionals, consultants, and auditors.
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer certification is ideal for professionals who are responsible for managing the implementation of an ISMS in their organizations. This includes IT managers, security managers, risk managers, and other professionals who are involved in the implementation and management of information security systems. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam certification is also suitable for consultants and auditors who provide advice on the implementation of an ISMS.
The ISO/IEC 27001 standard is the most widely recognized framework for information security management systems, and is used by organizations of all sizes and industries. The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer certification exam covers the essential components of the standard, including risk management, security controls, compliance, and continuous improvement. Those who pass the exam will have demonstrated that they have the skills to effectively implement and manage an ISMS in accordance with the ISO/IEC 27001 standard.
NEW QUESTION # 126
Which tool is used to identify, analyze, and manage interested parties?
- A. The probability/impact matrix
- B. The power/interest matrix
- C. The likelihood/severity matrix
Answer: B
Explanation:
The power/interest matrix is a tool that can be used to identify, analyze, and manage interested parties according to ISO/IEC 27001:2022. The power/interest matrix is a two-dimensional diagram that plots the level of power and interest of each interested party in relation to the organization's information security objectives.
The power/interest matrix can help the organization to prioritize the interested parties, understand their expectations and needs, and develop appropriate communication and engagement strategies. The power/interest matrix can also help the organization to identify potential risks and opportunities related to the interested parties.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 4.2; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 4, slide 12.
NEW QUESTION # 127
The Incident Response Team (IRT) has been notified of a potential compromise in the organization's network. Which type of services would be most appropriate for the IRT to provide in this situation?
- A. Reactive services
- B. Proactive services
- C. Security quality management services
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 128
Scenario 10: ProEBank
ProEBank is an Austrian financial institution known for its comprehensive range of banking services. Headquartered in Vienna, it leaverages the city's advanced technological and financial ecosystem To enhance its security posture, ProEBank has implementied an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001. After a year of having the ISMS in place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001.
To prepare for the audit, the company first informed its employees for the audit and organized training sessions to prepare them. It also prepared documented information in advance, so that the documents would be ready when external auditors asked to review them Additionally, it determined which of its employees have the knowledge to help the external auditors understand and evaluate the processes.
During the planning phase for the audit, ProEBank reviewed the list of assigned auditors provided by the certification body. Upon reviewing the list, ProEBank identified a potential conflict of interest with one of the auditors, who had previously worked for ProEBank's mein competitor in the banking industry To ensure the integrity of the audit process. ProEBank refused to undergo the audit until a completely new audit team was assigned. In response, the certification body acknowledged the conflict of interest and made the necessary adjustments to ensure the impartiality of the audit team After the resolution of this issue, the audit team assessed whether the ISMS met both the standard's requirements and the company's objectives. During this process, the audit team focused on reviewing documented information.
Three weeks later, the team conducted an on-site visit to the auditee's location where they aimed to evaluate whether the ISMS conformed to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. was effectively implemented, and enabled the auditee to reach its information security objectives. After the on-site visit the team prepared the audit conclusions and notified the auditee that some minor nonconformities had been detected The audit team leader then issued a recommendation for certification.
After receiving the recommendation from the audit team leader, the certification body established a committee to make the decision for certification. The committee included one member from the audit team and two other experts working for the certification body.
After the Stage 2 audit, minor nonconformities were found. Despite this, the audit team leader issued a positive recommendation for certification.
Is this acceptable?
- A. No - the auditor should have issued a recommendation for certification conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans for the minor nonconformities
- B. No - the auditor should have issued an unfavorable recommendation for certification because minor nonconformities were identified
- C. Yes - a recommendation for certification should be issued when only minor nonconformities are identified
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 129
Scenario 6: Skyver offers worldwide shipping of electronic products, including gaming consoles, flat-screen TVs. computers, and printers. In order to ensure information security, the company has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001.
Colin, the company's best information security expert, decided to hold a training and awareness session for the personnel of the company regarding the information security challenges and other information security-related controls. The session included topics such as Skyver's information security approaches and techniques for mitigating phishing and malware.
One of the participants in the session is Lisa, who works in the HR Department. Although Colin explains the existing Skyver's information security policies and procedures in an honest and fair manner, she finds some of the issues being discussed too technical and does not fully understand the session. Therefore, in a lot of cases, she requests additional help from the trainer and her colleagues What is the difference between training and awareness? Refer to scenario 6.
- A. Training helps acquire certain skills, whereas awareness develops certain habits and behaviors.
- B. Training helps acquire a skill, whereas awareness helps apply it in practice
- C. Training helps transfer a message with the intent of informing, whereas awareness helps change the behavior toward the message
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 130
Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS. However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body The certification body rejected NetworkFuse's request to change the audit team leader. Is this acceptable? Refer to scenario 10.
- A. Yes, because NetworkFuse did not give a valid reason to support their claims
- B. No, auditee's requests for the replacement of auditors must be accepted
- C. No, because an auditee cannot request the rejection of an audit team member
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer course, the certification body is responsible for selecting and appointing the audit team members, taking into account the competence, impartiality, and objectivity of the auditors1. The auditee can request the replacement of an audit team member only if there is a valid reason to doubt their competence or impartiality, such as a personal or professional conflict of interest, a lack of relevant experience or qualifications, or a previous involvement in the auditee's activities2. However, NetworkFuse did not give a valid reason to support their claims, as the fact that the audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to their main competitor does not imply a conflict of interest or a bias. Therefore, the certification body rejected NetworkFuse's request to change the audit team leader, which is acceptable.
NEW QUESTION # 131
Based on the last paragraph of scenario 6, which principles of an effective communication strategy did Colin NOT follow?
- A. Transparency and credibility
- B. Credibility and responsiveness
- C. Appropriateness and clarity
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 132
According to scenario 1. to detect (1)____________________________, Antiques should have implemented (2)
- A. (1) Patches. (2) an access control software
- B. (1) Technical vulnerabilities. (2) network intrusions
- C. (1) Intrusions on networks. (?) an intrusion detection system
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 133
Scenario 9:
OpenTech, headquartered in San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions. Its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients to transition smoothly into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.
Recently, Tim, the internal auditor of OpenTech, conducted an internal audit that uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities. In response to these nonconformities, OpenTech decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to address the issues systematically. This method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of the issues. The approach involves several steps: First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.
Following the analysis of the root causes of the nonconformities, OpenTech's ISMS project manager, Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity. While assessing potential corrective actions, Julia identified one issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its recurrence. Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Julia then combined all the nonconformities into a single action plan and sought approval from top management. The submitted action plan was written as follows:
"A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department." However, Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management. The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval. Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process. Additionally, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.
Did OpenTech have a plan in place to implement permanent corrective action to address the identified nonconformities?
- A. No, OpenTech decided not to pursue this course of action
- B. No, OpenTech did not have a clear plan to implement a permanent corrective action
- C. Yes, OpenTech had a comprehensive plan in place to implement permanent corrective actions
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 134
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the work accordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
According to scenario 7, a demilitarized zone (DMZ) is deployed within InfoSec's network. What type of control has InfoSec implemented in this case?
- A. Preventive
- B. Detective
- C. Corrective
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 135
Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What caused SunDee's workforce disruption?
- A. The inconsistency of reports written by different employees
- B. The negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures
- C. The voluminous written reports
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clause 9.1, an organization must monitor, measure, analyze and evaluate its information security performance and effectiveness. This includes determining what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for doing so, when and by whom the monitoring and measurement shall be performed, when the results shall be analyzed and evaluated, and who shall be responsible for ensuring that the actions arising from the analysis and evaluation are taken 1.
SunDee failed to comply with this requirement and did not monitor or measure the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS for the past two years. As a result, the company did not have any objective evidence or indicators to demonstrate the achievement of its information security objectives, the effectiveness of its controls, the satisfaction of its interested parties, or the identification and treatment of its risks. Thisalso meant that the company did not conduct regular management reviews of its ISMS, as required by clause 9.3, which would provide an opportunity for the top management to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the ISMS, and to decide on any changes or improvements needed 1.
Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit, as required by clause
9.2, which is a systematic, independent and documented processfor obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled 1. However, the company did not have a well-defined audit program, scope, criteria, or methodology, and relied on the written reports of its staff for the past two years. This caused a disruption in the workforce, as most of the staff had to compile their reports for their departments, leaving the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock. Moreover, the internal audit process was very inconsistent, as the reports were written by different employees with different styles, formats, and levels of detail. The internal audit process also lacked any qualitative measures, such as performance indicators, metrics, or benchmarks, to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS.
Therefore, the cause of SunDee's workforce disruption was the negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures, which led to a lack of objective evidence, a poorly planned and executed internal audit, and a decrease in the company's productivity and stock value.
NEW QUESTION # 136
Scenario 8: SunDee is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, US. Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, SunDee places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. SunDee has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.
In preparation for the recertification audit, SunDee conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment, Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.
During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader.
SunDee's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvement. Decisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow-up action plans, which were then approved by top management.
In response to the review outcomes, SunDee promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its information security measures. Additionally, dashboard tools were introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities. Furthermore, SunDee embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes. The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Does SunDee's approach align with the best practices for evaluating and maintaining the effectiveness of an ISMS?
- A. Yes, because a diverse set of measures minimizes the likelihood of overlooking any potential security risks
- B. Yes, because comprehensive coverage is essential to achieve ISMS objectives
- C. No, as an excessive number of measures may distort SunDee's focus and obscure what is genuinely important
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 137
Scenario 9: OpenTech provides IT and communications services. It helps data communication enterprises and network operators become multi-service providers During an internal audit, its internal auditor, Tim, has identified nonconformities related to the monitoring procedures He identified and evaluated several system Invulnerabilities.
Tim found out that user IDs for systems and services that process sensitive information have been reused and the access control policy has not been followed After analyzing the root causes of this nonconformity, the ISMS project manager developed a list of possible actions to resolve the nonconformity. Then, the ISMS project manager analyzed the list and selected the activities that would allow the elimination of the root cause and the prevention of a similar situation in the future. These activities were included in an action plan The action plan, approved by the top management, was written as follows:
A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department The approved action plan was implemented and all actions described in the plan were documented.
Based on scenario 9. did the ISMS project manager complete the corrective action process appropriately?
- A. No, the corrective action did not address the root cause of the nonconformity
- B. No, the corrective action process should also include the review of the implementation of the selected actions
- C. Yes, the corrective action process should include the identification of the nonconformity, situation analysis, and implementation of corrective actions
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, the corrective action process consists of the following steps12:
Reacting to the nonconformity and, as applicable, taking action to control and correct it and deal with the consequences Evaluating the need for action to eliminate the root cause(s) of the nonconformity, in order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere Implementing the action needed Reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken Making changes to the information security management system, if necessary In scenario 9, the ISMS project manager did not complete the last step of reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken. This step is important to verify that the corrective action has achieved the intended results and that no adverse effects have been introduced. The review can be done by using various methods, such as audits, tests, inspections, or performance indicators3. Therefore, the ISMS project manager did not complete the corrective action process appropriately.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.2 2: Procedure for Corrective Action [ISO 27001 templates] 3: ISO 27001 Clause 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
NEW QUESTION # 138
Prior to employment, _________ as well as terms & conditions of employment are included as controls in ISO
27002 to ensure that employees and contractors understand their responsibilities and are suitable for the roles for which they are considered.
- A. authorizing
- B. flexing
- C. screening
- D. controlling
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 139
Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS. However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body Based on scenario 10. NetworkFuse did not conduct a self-evaluation of the ISMS before the audit. Is this compliant to ISO/IEC 27001?
- A. No, the auditee must review the requirements of clauses 4 to 10 before the conduct of a certification audit
- B. Yes, the standard indicates that the auditee shall rely only on internal audit and management review reports to prepare for the certification audit
- C. Yes, the standard does not require to conduct a self-evaluation before the audit but it is a good practice to follow
Answer: C
Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard, the organization is responsible for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving the information security management system (ISMS) in accordance with the requirements of the standard (section 4.1). The standard does not explicitly require the organization to conduct a self-evaluation of the ISMS before the certification audit, which is an external audit performed by an independent certification body to verify the conformity of the ISMS with the standard and to grant the certification (section 9.3.2). However, the standard does require the organization to conduct internal audits (section 9.2) and management reviews (section 9.3) of the ISMS at planned intervals to ensure its effectiveness, suitability and adequacy, and to identify opportunities for improvement and corrective actions. Therefore, conducting a self-evaluation of the ISMS before the certification audit is a good practice to follow, as it can help the organization to prepare for the audit, to identify any gaps or nonconformities, and to demonstrate its commitment and readiness for the certification.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements1 ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Info Kit SELF EVALUATION CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 27001:20222
NEW QUESTION # 140
Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What caused SunDee's workforce disruption?
- A. The inconsistency of reports written by different employees
- B. The negligence of performance evaluation and monitoring and measurement procedures
- C. The voluminous written reports
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 141
Scenario 9: OpenTech provides IT and communications services. It helps data communication enterprises and network operators become multi-service providers During an internal audit, its internal auditor, Tim, has identified nonconformities related to the monitoring procedures He identified and evaluated several system Invulnerabilities.
Tim found out that user IDs for systems and services that process sensitive information have been reused and the access control policy has not been followed After analyzing the root causes of this nonconformity, the ISMS project manager developed a list of possible actions to resolve the nonconformity. Then, the ISMS project manager analyzed the list and selected the activities that would allow the elimination of the root cause and the prevention of a similar situation in the future. These activities were included in an action plan The action plan, approved by the top management, was written as follows:
A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department The approved action plan was implemented and all actions described in the plan were documented.
Based on scenario 9. did the ISMS project manager complete the corrective action process appropriately?
- A. No, the corrective action did not address the root cause of the nonconformity
- B. No, the corrective action process should also include the review of the implementation of the selected actions
- C. Yes, the corrective action process should include the identification of the nonconformity, situation analysis, and implementation of corrective actions
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, the corrective action process consists of the following steps12:
* Reacting to the nonconformity and, as applicable, taking action to control and correct it and deal with the consequences
* Evaluating the need for action to eliminate the root cause(s) of the nonconformity, in order that it does not recur or occur elsewhere
* Implementing the action needed
* Reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken
* Making changes to the information security management system, if necessary In scenario 9, the ISMS project manager did not complete the last step of reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken. This step is important to verify that the corrective action has achieved the intended results and that no adverse effects have been introduced. The review can be done by using various methods, such as audits, tests, inspections, or performance indicators3. Therefore, the ISMS project manager did not complete the corrective action process appropriately.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 10.2 2: Procedure for Corrective Action [ISO 27001 templates] 3: ISO 27001 Clause 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
NEW QUESTION # 142
Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS.
However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body According to scenario 10, NetworkFuse requested from the certification body to review all the documentation only on-site. Is this acceptable?
- A. Yes, only if a confidentiality agreement is formerly signed by the audit team
- B. Yes, the auditee may request that the review of the documentation takes place on-site
- C. No, the certification body decides whether the documentation review takes place on-site or off-site
Answer: C
Explanation:
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard, the certification body is responsible for planning and conducting the audit, including the review of the documented information. The certification body may decide to review the documentation on-site or off-site, depending on the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and risks.
The auditee may not impose any restrictions on the access to the documentation, unless there are valid reasons for confidentiality or security. However, such restrictions should be agreed upon before the audit and should not compromise the effectiveness and impartiality of the audit.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 9.2.2
* ISO/IEC 27006:2021, clause 7.1.4
NEW QUESTION # 143
Scenario 3: Socket Inc is a telecommunications company offering mainly wireless products and services. It uses MongoDB. a document model database that offers high availability, scalability, and flexibility.
Last month, Socket Inc. reported an information security incident. A group of hackers compromised its MongoDB database, because the database administrators did not change its default settings, leaving it without a password and publicly accessible.
Fortunately. Socket Inc. performed regular information backups in their MongoDB database, so no information was lost during the incident. In addition, a syslog server allowed Socket Inc. to centralize all logs in one server. The company found out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was not initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing the event logs that record user faults and exceptions.
To prevent similar incidents in the future, Socket Inc. decided to use an access control system that grants access to authorized personnel only. The company also implemented a control in order to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, and regulations, and the information classification scheme. To improve security and reduce the administrative efforts, network segregation using VPNs was proposed.
Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, and integrate information security into project management.
Based on scenario 3. which information security control of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 did Socket Inc.
implement by establishing a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats?
- A. Annex A 5.13 Labeling of information
- B. Annex A 5 7 Threat Intelligence
- C. Annex A 5.5 Contact with authorities
Answer: B
Explanation:
Annex A 5.7 Threat Intelligence is a new control in ISO 27001:2022 that aims to provide the organisation with relevant information regarding the threats and vulnerabilities of its information systems and the potential impacts of information security incidents. By establishing a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, Socket Inc. implemented this control and improved its ability to prevent, detect, and respond to information security incidents.
NEW QUESTION # 144
Based on scenario 5. Socket Inc. decided to assign users lo a separate network when accessing cloud storage tiles. What does this ensure?
- A. Creation of backup copies of files
- B. Elimination of risks related to the use of cloud storage services
- C. Belter security when using cloud storage files
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 145
ISO 27002 provides guidance in the following area
- A. Framework for an overall security andcompliance program
- B. Information handling recommendations
- C. Detailed lists of required policies and procedures
- D. PCI environment scoping
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 146
......
Get professional help from our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps PDF: https://www.testkingit.com/PECB/latest-ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer-exam-dumps.html
Give You Free Regular Updates on ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TiNLdcxzLGMd_-AVPtV-THYUtcYlTfG3